Репозиторий Sisyphus
Последнее обновление: 23 мая 2019 | Пакетов: 17691 | Посещений: 13581765
en ru br
Майнтейнер: Nikita Ermakov

 Информация   Пакеты   Bugs and FR  Repocop 

Сообщения от repocop:

пакет статус тест сообщение
acr-1.7.2-alt1.noarch
warn
sisyphus_check-check-dirlist sisyphus_check --check-dirlist failed: package contains a directory /usr/share/vim that exclusively belongs to package vim-common sisyphus_check --check-dirlist failed: package contains a directory /usr/share/vim/vimfiles that exclusively belongs to package vim-common sisyphus_check --check-dirlist failed: package contains a directory /usr/share/vim/vimfiles/ftplugin that exclusively belongs to package vim-common sisyphus_check --check-dirlist failed: package contains a directory /usr/share/vim/vimfiles/syntax that exclusively belongs to package vim-common
capstone-4.0.1-alt1.x86_64
info
beehive-log-unpackaged-files-found-i586 warning: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/bin/cstool
capstone-4.0.1-alt1.x86_64
info
beehive-log-unpackaged-files-found-x86_64 warning: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/bin/cstool
capstone-4.0.1-alt1.x86_64
info
altlinux-policy-shared-lib-contains-devel-so SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libcapstone.so but just /usr/lib64/libcapstone.so.4. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libcapstone.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libcapstone.so to \%files of capstone-4.0.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
capstone-4.0.1-alt1.x86_64
info
library-pkgnames package contains public library which is used in external packages: name should be lib* according to http://altlinux.org/Drafts/SharedLibs
libgdb-devel-8.2.50.20180917-alt2.x86_64
warn
library-pkgnames-static package contains static library which has the same name as a shared library in the repository, but neither package name ends with -devel-static according to http://altlinux.org/Drafts/SharedLibs nor the package explicitly conflicts with the package with .so library
radare2-3.5.1-alt1.x86_64
info
altlinux-policy-shared-lib-contains-devel-so SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_anal.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_anal.so.3.5.1. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_anal.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_anal.so to \%files of radare2-3.5.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test. SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_asm.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_asm.so.3.5.1. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_asm.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just app... [the rest of the message is skipped]
radare2-3.5.1-alt1.x86_64
info
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
xrootd-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64
info
altlinux-policy-shared-lib-contains-devel-so SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdAppUtils.so but just /usr/lib64/libXrdAppUtils.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdAppUtils.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libXrdAppUtils.so to \%files of xrootd-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test. SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdCl.so but just /usr/lib64/libXrdCl.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdCl.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib
xrootd-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64
info
beehive-log-unpackaged-files-found-i586 warning: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/libXrdHttpTPC-4.so
xrootd-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64
info
beehive-log-unpackaged-files-found-x86_64 warning: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib64/libXrdHttpTPC-4.so
xrootd-devel-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64
info
altlinux-policy-shared-lib-contains-devel-so SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdCryptoLite.so but just /usr/lib64/libXrdCryptoLite.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdCryptoLite.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libXrdCryptoLite.so to \%files of xrootd-devel-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test. SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdHttpUtils.so but just /usr/lib64/libXrdHttpUtils.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdHttpUtils.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have alre... [the rest of the message is skipped]
 
дизайн и разработка: Vladimir Lettiev aka crux © 2004-2005, Andrew Avramenko aka liks © 2007-2008
текущий майнтейнер: Michael Shigorin