Репозиторий Sisyphus
Последнее обновление: 18 сентября 2019 | Пакетов: 17444 | Посещений: 15116783
en ru br
Майнтейнер: Nikita Ermakov

 Информация   Пакеты   Bugs and FR  Repocop 

Сообщения от repocop:

пакет статус тест сообщение
acr-1.7.2-alt1.noarch
warn
sisyphus_check-check-dirlist sisyphus_check --check-dirlist failed: package contains a directory /usr/share/vim that exclusively belongs to package vim-common sisyphus_check --check-dirlist failed: package contains a directory /usr/share/vim/vimfiles that exclusively belongs to package vim-common sisyphus_check --check-dirlist failed: package contains a directory /usr/share/vim/vimfiles/ftplugin that exclusively belongs to package vim-common sisyphus_check --check-dirlist failed: package contains a directory /usr/share/vim/vimfiles/syntax that exclusively belongs to package vim-common
altocation-1.0-alt1.noarch
experimental
checkbashisms checkbashisms utility found possible bashisms in: /usr/bin/altocation.sh
capstone-4.0.1-alt1.x86_64
info
beehive-log-unpackaged-files-found-i586 warning: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/bin/cstool
capstone-4.0.1-alt1.x86_64
info
beehive-log-unpackaged-files-found-x86_64 warning: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/bin/cstool
capstone-4.0.1-alt1.x86_64
info
altlinux-policy-shared-lib-contains-devel-so SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libcapstone.so but just /usr/lib64/libcapstone.so.4. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libcapstone.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libcapstone.so to \%files of capstone-4.0.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
capstone-4.0.1-alt1.x86_64
info
library-pkgnames package contains public library which is used in external packages: name should be lib* according to http://altlinux.org/Drafts/SharedLibs
iwpmd-24.0-alt3.x86_64
experimental
checkbashisms checkbashisms utility found possible bashisms in: /etc/rc.d/init.d/iwpmd
libwebkitgtk3-2.4.11-alt8.x86_64
info
beehive-log-unpackaged-files-found-i586 warning: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/include/webkitgtk-3.0/webkit2/WebKitAuthenticationRequest.h /usr/include/webkitgtk-3.0/webkit2/WebKitBackForwardList.h /usr/include/webkitgtk-3.0/webkit2/WebKitBackForwardListItem.h /usr/include/webkitgtk-3.0/webkit2/WebKitCertificateInfo.h /usr/include/webkitgtk-3.0/webkit2/WebKitContextMenu.h /usr/include/webkitgtk-3.0/webkit2/WebKitContextMenuActions.h /usr/include/webkitgtk-3.0/webkit2/WebKitContextMenuItem.h /usr/include/webkitgtk-3.0/webkit2/WebKitCookieManager.h /usr/include/webkitgtk-3.0/webkit2/WebKitCredential.h /usr/include/webkitgtk-3.0/webkit2/WebKitDefines.h /usr/include/webkitgtk-3.0/webkit2/WebKitDownload.h /usr/include/webkitgtk-3.0/webkit2/WebKitEditingCommands.h /usr/include/webkitgtk-3.0/webkit2/WebKitEnumTypes.h /usr/include/webkitgtk-3.0/webkit2/WebKitError.h /usr/include/webkitgtk-3.0/webkit2/WebKitFaviconDatabase.h /usr/include/webkitgtk-3.0/webkit2/WebKitFileChooserRequest.h /usr/include/webkitgtk-3.0/webk... [the rest of the message is skipped]
libwebkitgtk3-2.4.11-alt8.x86_64
info
beehive-log-unpackaged-files-found-x86_64 warning: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/include/webkitgtk-3.0/webkit2/WebKitAuthenticationRequest.h /usr/include/webkitgtk-3.0/webkit2/WebKitBackForwardList.h /usr/include/webkitgtk-3.0/webkit2/WebKitBackForwardListItem.h /usr/include/webkitgtk-3.0/webkit2/WebKitCertificateInfo.h /usr/include/webkitgtk-3.0/webkit2/WebKitContextMenu.h /usr/include/webkitgtk-3.0/webkit2/WebKitContextMenuActions.h /usr/include/webkitgtk-3.0/webkit2/WebKitContextMenuItem.h /usr/include/webkitgtk-3.0/webkit2/WebKitCookieManager.h /usr/include/webkitgtk-3.0/webkit2/WebKitCredential.h /usr/include/webkitgtk-3.0/webkit2/WebKitDefines.h /usr/include/webkitgtk-3.0/webkit2/WebKitDownload.h /usr/include/webkitgtk-3.0/webkit2/WebKitEditingCommands.h /usr/include/webkitgtk-3.0/webkit2/WebKitEnumTypes.h /usr/include/webkitgtk-3.0/webkit2/WebKitError.h /usr/include/webkitgtk-3.0/webkit2/WebKitFaviconDatabase.h /usr/include/webkitgtk-3.0/webkit2/WebKitFileChooserRequest.h /usr/include/webkitgtk-3.0/webk... [the rest of the message is skipped]
pinentry-common-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64
experimental
checkbashisms checkbashisms utility found possible bashisms in: /usr/bin/pinentry
radare2-3.9.0-alt1.x86_64
info
altlinux-policy-shared-lib-contains-devel-so SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_anal.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_anal.so.3.9.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_anal.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_anal.so to \%files of radare2-3.9.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test. SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_asm.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_asm.so.3.9.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_asm.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just app... [the rest of the message is skipped]
radare2-3.9.0-alt1.x86_64
info
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
rdma-core-24.0-alt3.x86_64
info
beehive-log-unpackaged-files-found-i586 warning: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/sbin/srp_daemon.sh
rdma-core-24.0-alt3.x86_64
info
beehive-log-unpackaged-files-found-x86_64 warning: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/sbin/srp_daemon.sh
root6-6.19.01-alt1.x86_64
warn
rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file File /usr/bin/roots conflicts with the package arprec-2.2.19-alt1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
root6-6.19.01-alt1.x86_64
info
bin-permissions not executable file /usr/bin/setxrd.csh not executable file /usr/bin/setxrd.sh not executable file /usr/bin/thisroot.csh not executable file /usr/bin/thisroot.fish not executable file /usr/bin/thisroot.sh
root6-6.19.01-alt1.x86_64
info
beehive-log-unpackaged-files-found-x86_64 warning: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/share/doc/root/CREDITS /usr/share/doc/root/INSTALL /usr/share/doc/root/LICENSE /usr/share/doc/root/README /usr/share/doc/root/README.ALIEN /usr/share/doc/root/README.AUTH /usr/share/doc/root/README.CXXMODULES.md /usr/share/doc/root/README.MONALISA /usr/share/doc/root/README.SELECTOR /usr/share/doc/root/ReleaseNotes/empty.md /usr/share/doc/root/ReleaseNotes/old/ChangeLog-2-24 /usr/share/doc/root/ReleaseNotes/v604/colz0.png /usr/share/doc/root/ReleaseNotes/v604/index.md /usr/share/doc/root/ReleaseNotes/v604/nostackb.png /usr/share/doc/root/ReleaseNotes/v604/palette_100.png /usr/share/doc/root/ReleaseNotes/v604/palette_101.png /usr/share/doc/root/ReleaseNotes/v604/palette_102.png /usr/share/doc/root/ReleaseNotes/v604/palette_103.png /usr/share/doc/root/ReleaseNotes/v604/palette_104.png /usr/share/doc/root/ReleaseNotes/v604/palette_105.png /usr/share/doc/root/ReleaseNotes/v604/palette_106.png /usr/share/doc/root/ReleaseNotes/v604/pale... [the rest of the message is skipped]
root6-6.19.01-alt1.x86_64
experimental
checkbashisms checkbashisms utility found possible bashisms in: /usr/bin/proofserv /usr/bin/roots
runns-1.2-alt1.x86_64
experimental
checkbashisms checkbashisms utility found possible bashisms in: /usr/bin/clean-net
sandbox-2.18-alt1.x86_64
warn
rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file File /usr/bin/sandbox conflicts with the package policycoreutils-sandbox-2.9-alt2.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
sandbox-2.18-alt1.x86_64
info
beehive-log-unpackaged-files-found-i586 warning: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/share/applications/sandbox.desktop /usr/share/pixmaps/sandbox.svg
sandbox-2.18-alt1.x86_64
info
beehive-log-unpackaged-files-found-x86_64 warning: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/share/applications/sandbox.desktop /usr/share/pixmaps/sandbox.svg
srp_daemon-24.0-alt3.x86_64
experimental
checkbashisms checkbashisms utility found possible bashisms in: /etc/rc.d/init.d/srpd
xrootd-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64
info
altlinux-policy-shared-lib-contains-devel-so SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdAppUtils.so but just /usr/lib64/libXrdAppUtils.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdAppUtils.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libXrdAppUtils.so to \%files of xrootd-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test. SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdCl.so but just /usr/lib64/libXrdCl.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdCl.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib
xrootd-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64
info
beehive-log-unpackaged-files-found-i586 warning: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/libXrdHttpTPC-4.so
xrootd-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64
info
beehive-log-unpackaged-files-found-x86_64 warning: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib64/libXrdHttpTPC-4.so
xrootd-devel-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64
info
altlinux-policy-shared-lib-contains-devel-so SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdCryptoLite.so but just /usr/lib64/libXrdCryptoLite.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdCryptoLite.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libXrdCryptoLite.so to \%files of xrootd-devel-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test. SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdHttpUtils.so but just /usr/lib64/libXrdHttpUtils.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdHttpUtils.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have alre... [the rest of the message is skipped]
 
дизайн и разработка: Vladimir Lettiev aka crux © 2004-2005, Andrew Avramenko aka liks © 2007-2008
текущий майнтейнер: Michael Shigorin